final episode after centuries of dispute between the inhabitants and those of Montclus Thorn ...
Conflict of Practice
Since 1228, the inhabitants of the Thorn enjoyed extensive rights of several neighborhoods in the community Montclus (Terrus, Blachinard, Cougoule, ditches and Ro). Some of these rights were later transferred to the community for being exempt from the toll of a footbridge on the Pale, in the throat. But logging and grazing rights were reserved, in the words of a text, "for eternity". These uses were strongly contested by residents Montclus and frequent incidents broke out. The inhabitants of the Thorn, who were denied these rights, lodged a complaint before the Parliament of Grenoble and a stop of 1580 confirmed in their use. The inhabitants of Montclus, backed by their powerful lord, brought an action in 1686. Rejected again, they began to clear more than three quarters of land in these areas subject to user charges, which led to a complaint of EPINOIS. In 1724, they obtained damages. After the Revolution and the abolition of feudal rights, Trophème the domain owner Grand Terrus challenged those rights in the mainly-EPINOIS residents of the hamlet of Church always opposed the custom and usage. In 1842, Jean Antoine Dupoux, Miller and Mayor Montclus, will seek an amicable settlement. Two experts, and Gontrie Provensal, were chosen by the two municipalities in 1843 "in order to know with precision their respective proposals." In their report submitted in 1846, they conclude that "it should stop These use rights raised by the town of Thorn, the uses have lost those rights by the failure of a regular and legal possession of the right to drive their herd and lumberjack in the woods and pastures Montclus. But the City Council in 1856 Montclus notes that "some people of the Thorn did not observe the decisions of experts, have continued to use their rights and had called at the request deTrophème be brought before the criminal court they imposed the penalties provided by law. "These fines do not deter offenders since, by decision of 29 January 1888, the City Council Montclus, very accommodating but pressed by Trophème-which is a local-request permission to Prefect of legal action to defend these rights of use. It states that "too many quarrels took place between the two towns and the inhabitants of the Thorn have been held in exercising their rights of use, the commune does not preclude the exercise, but one owner, Mr Trophème Agusta claims Terrus free his field by drawing up the minutes to the inhabitants of the Spine and prevent the free exercise of their rights. Whereas is his duty to safeguard the interests of the owners of the town who are threatened by the pretensions of their neighbors, joins the action taken by Mr. Trophème to punish crimes committed by the inhabitants of the Thorn cons properties, that the Mayor of Montclus informed the mayor of Thorn that the constable was ordered to draw up the minutes. "The civil court appointed the Gap and other experts who visited the site but not deposited never report. In 1889 and 1890 two decisions of the Civil Court of Gap began after four centuries of legal disputes by confirming the loss of these EPINOIS use rights.
Sources: Report of the expert council of the Prefect Montclus dated January 1888Jugement du29 made by the Civil Court of Gap dated August 5, 1890.
Departmental Archives.
0 comments:
Post a Comment